Soft Spot Cinema – Vanilla Sky

I think the first thing I should admit is that I haven’t seen the film Open Your Eyes, the original and acclaimed Spanish production that paved the way for the American remake.

I’ve seen Vanilla Sky twice. 

Surely a few have dismissed this article already, but I’m hoping you’ll bare with it, at least until you’ve heard my side of the story.  The second thing I need to admit is that, yes, I did actually enjoy the film. That said, there are very few fundamentally bad films that I actually like, which inspired me to write about this one.  The first time I saw it, I was about 13 years-old and my initial impression was repulsion. It was a film that really didn’t know what it wanted to be; Science-Fiction, Drama, Romance, Thriller, it had all these elements, but neither was better than the other, they were all merely average. Then there was the use of music. Cameron Crowe is well known for bombarding his films with culturally relevant music, and it worked for Almost Famous. Here however, it felt like a smug addition, an outlet for him to tell everyone just how relevant he is. It just didn’t gel though, and it struggles to develop any mood or tone from that point on.

Admittedly I still have those issues with the movie the second time around and it still has a plethora of other problems. Somehow though, out of the blue, came an ending that really moved me.

David Aames (Tom Cruise) has been taking his life for granted. Everything seemed to go right for him, his incredible wealth, the publishing company he just inherited from his deceased father, his good looks and his “friends with benefits” attitude to relationships. It all comes crashing down, literally, when close friend Julie Gianna (Cameron Diaz) struggles to form the relationship she wants with David and in a panic, drives them both over the side of a bridge, killing Julie and deforming David beyond recognition. What develops is a disturbing tale that delves deep into the human condition.

Few will doubt the performances in the film. Cruise is at the height of his power, coming straight off his amazing work in Eyes Wide Shut he doesn’t miss a beat here as the broken and mentally unstable David Aames. Cameron Diaz also delivers after her daring portrayal in Being John Malkovic. Penelope Cruz (who was in the original version playing Diaz’s part) is excellent as Sophia and adds a lot of emotional weight to the proceedings. Rounding out the other performances are Kurt Russell, Jason Lee and Tilda Swinton who are all amiable. Yet despite all this it’s Cruise who is at the centre of the film, and although the material is heavy, he triumphs with a great sense of gravitas.

Does this picture look familiar? It's a clue.

It’s a bizarre film, and many will be either disappointed or confused by the events that take place. Having seen it recently though, it still feels incredibly relevant. The twist ending does clear quite a few things up, probably too much for those that like to discuss the films afterwards, but it also leaves a lasting impression. The most important questions that need to be answered are left alone, and it’s the right call. It’s a poignant climax, complex but not without the right emotions. It’s a pity though, that the first two acts are so lopsided, as it could have made for a more potent story, and a potential classic, or maybe I should have just seen the original (I swear I will).

Love it or hate it, Vanilla Sky is a film that can be discussed, and that’s exactly what Cameron Crowe was going for here. It’s been dismissed at first glance as an overtly pretentious sci-fi romance, but it’s quite a bit more. With the right focus and intent this could have been a great film, instead, it’s an ambitious mess.

3/5

Venice Film Festival delivers the goods

Well, the Venice Film Festival just came to an end with some seriously huge talent vying for the top prize; the Golden Lion. Some of the films that ran in competition included Darren Aronofsky’s Black Swan (trailer down the page), Sofia Coppola’s Somewhere, Richard Lewis’ film Barney’s Version, actor Vincent Gallo’s Promises Written in Water and Takashi Miike’s 13 Assassins.

With Quentin Tarantino as the VFF’s Jury Head, the choice for a winner was surely going to be an excellent one. Prior to Venice he chose Oldboy as the Grand Jury Prize winner at the Cannes Film Festival in 2004, and it was thoroughly deserved I might add. This year it went to the highly anticipated follow up from Sofia Coppola. Her film Somewhere comes straight off the back of a seriously mixed and uneven Marie Antoinette biopic entitled…Marie Antoinette. Based on the trailer, Somewhere follows a similar path as one of her previous films, Lost In Translation. It stars Stephen Dorff and Elle Fanning (Dakota Fanning’s younger sister) as a father and daughter team that have recently been brought together his success as a film actor and celebrity. You can view the trailer below:

                             

Lost in Translation is one of my personal favourites, so it was great to see Sofia’s newest film get great buzz, especially after stumbling a little with Marie Antoinette. I’ll definitely be curious to see Black Swan and 13 Assassins from two directors that really like to push the envelope. I was wondering what you guys thought of the Venice showings, and possibly the upcoming Toronto Film Festival. Was there anything that really caught your eye?

A pilgrimage to consider – Scott Pilgrim vs. The World review

Going into Scott Pilgrim vs. The World I realised just how little I knew about the popular graphic novel that  proceeded it. Usually with this type of comic-book adaptation I’ll scoot through the novel in a couple of days and watch the film afterwards. After seeing the trailer however, it completely dropped off my radar. It wasn’t an awful trailer by any means, but it was another Michael Cera vehicle that would only be eaten up by Arrested Development and Juno fans who love Michael Cera being Michael Cera. Yes, I said Michael Cera three times in a sentence, moving on. Once I found out Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz director Edgar Wright was making the film however, I saw a spark of hope. Was Scott Pilgrim to be his downfall? or would his adaptation succeed in a violent display of style over substance?

Michael Cera plays Scott Pilgrim, a 23 year-old ultra-slacker who practically thrives on videogames and rock & roll. He lives in wintery Toronto and shares a flat with his gay friend Wallace (played by Kieran Culkin). Scott’s band, Sex Bob-omb consists of members Kim (Alison Pill) and Stephen (Mark Webber), who are both blown away when Scott tells them that he’s in a relationship with a 17 year-old, Knives Chau (Ellen Wong). Scott’s world is quickly turned upside-down though when he meets Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth-Winstead), a pink-haired stranger who is visiting Toronto for a short time. He is completely drawn to her for a time, until he discovers that he must defeat Ramona’s 7 evil exes in order to date her. Tough break kid.

From the very beginning you’re convinced that Scott Pilgrim is going to be the ultimate generation-Y movie. The Universal logo appears in all its pixelated glory like it’s being played through a Nintendo, with a super cool 8-bit theme song to get tone of the movie down before we’ve even seen a second of it. The TV show references, the clothes, the hair, the music and the games, oh the games. Someone also has to give the editor a medal for their work here. Not only does Scott Pilgrim move at breakneck pace, but it’s also surprisingly coherent and touching, given how little time there was for character development. The battles against the 7 exes are fast and original, although it does at times get a little bogged down, and there-in lies the problem with it. The film is fairly lengthy at around 2 hours and threatens to lose steam after the first 3 battles. Those that aren’t “with it” from the start are in for a very long roller-coaster ride, one that will probably make them sick. Others will relish every adrenaline-boosting beatdown that occurs, and boy does it occur often. It follows a similar path to Edgar Wright’s last two movies, in that they start off exceedingly strong, but begin to falter during the far less interesting second-half. It doesn’t prevent the film from having a lasting impression however.

Performances range from merely okay to great. Michael Cera makes for a great Michael Cera, and not much more. A lot was said about his casting in the roll of Pilgrim but he is neither bad nor good. It’s fair to say if you weren’t a fan of him before seeing the movie, then you won’t be after. The rest of the cast are uniformly funny, with each of the 7 exes delving into their roles with reckless abandon, I won’t go into it too much out of spoiler fear, but there are a few cool cameos in place. Kieran Culkin laps up his role as Scott’s gay roommate, and Alison Pill’s deadpan portrayal of Kim is stellar. Mary Elizabeth-Winstead’s Ramona is both completely apathetic and super sweet. I would have liked to see more in regard to her past, but she does a nice job given the slim material.

As a film likely to be loved and despised in equal measure, Scott Pilgrim succeeds at what it sets out to do. What that is…I couldn’t really explain. All you need to know is that it’s fast-paced, funny and fist-pumpingly awesome in every respect. Aside from being a little too long, this slacker-comedy is likely to hit home with the ultimate college couch-potatoes and select hipster crowds. It also totally persuaded me to pick up the novels. IMPRESSIVE COMBO.

3.5/5

Michael Kiossev.

Top 10 Films of the last decade – MK

To celebrate in the interests of absolutely no one but myself, I’ve compiled a list of films that made an impact on me this last decade. Why? Good question, I have no idea honestly, I guess you could say I enjoy angering pseudo-film buffs, polarizing Will Ferrell fans, and just cranking my ego up a notch. I mean, this list is pretty damn definitive in my eyes.

First of all I’d just like to say that some of the films I see customers rent at my video store are beyond woeful, and that’s an understatement. How these “films” even gets made confounds me. Okay, so you want to relax and watch something light every once in a while, that’s fine, by all means do it, but not EVERYTIME you come in you damn zombie. So, in the spirit of educating some of the uncultured, and not wasting any more time ranting, here is the DEFINITIVE TOP 10 FILMS OF THE DECADE (WITH HONOURABLE MENTIONS).

Honorable Mention: Punch-Drunk Love, Goodbye Lenin!, Y Tu Mama Tambien, A Prophet, The New World

10)Royal Tenenbaums: Made way back in the ancient period of 2001 was The Royal Tenenbaums, a film that brought a whole new meaning to the term dysfunctional. It was a departure from the average dramady and general audiences found it difficult to adjust to the slow pace, but for fans of director Wes Anderson, it was purely vintage. The cast was nothing less than all-star, featuring Gene Hackman, Ben Stiller, Gwyneth Paltrow, Owen Wilson and Bill Murray, just to name a few. Anderson’s previous effort Rushmore had put him on the map as one of the more interesting and challenging directors of this era, and most of his films have followed a very particular style, one that’s loved and despised in equal measure. The Royal Tenenbaums is a culmination of his greatest assets. The acting, the cinematography, the music and the emotional weight that the script carries are all prominent making this one of the best films I saw this decade.

9) Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring: Don’t think I didn’t hear all your collective hearts drop at the thought of reading subtitles, but you’ll have to in order to experience the incredible story that unfolds in the film Spring, Summer (2003) by Korean director Kim Ki-Duk. The film depicts the various stages of a Buddhist monks life through the seasons. Each season is a different chapter in the man’s life, learning a number of lessons that lead to his inevitable spiritual awakening. If you haven’t already fallen asleep reading that last sentence, I’ll continue. The film takes place on a monastery floating in a lake, surrounded by dense forest that brims with life. It’s hard to talk much about the story with spoiling it. However, I can say that the film comes full circle in a number of ways. The methodical nature of the monk’s work is engrossing to watch. The sternness and beauty of his lessons feel cold at times, but ultimately realistic. I urge people to bare with it, because the ending makes a great film even more worthwhile.

8)The Assassination of Jesse James : Now, this film and my next film were nearly impossible to separate, both films exhibit incredible artistry and attention to detail. If it were up to me I would make them both even, but in following the rules of the TOP 10, I can’t allow it folks. Anyway, here is Australian director Andrew Dominik’s Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford *takes breath*. Andrew Dominik was responsible for the film Chopper, and if you haven’t heard of or seen Chopper then get the hell out from under your rock and rent it because it’s great. Assassination is a bigger film, much bigger. I don’t know what Dominik was on when he made this, but I doubt his ambitions were the only thing sky high. The best advice I can give before you hand over your three hours is prepare. Have a drink, have a bite, take a dump and get ready for this film to make you it’s bitch. It stars Brad Pitt and Casey Affleck who play Jesse James and Robert Ford respectively. It details his beginnings as a bandit and to eventually becoming the infamous outlaw that everyone loved to hate. There are so many elements that make Assassination great that it’s impossible to name them all off. The pacing, the performances, the setting, the music, everything here melds beautifully. I won’t say the three hours fly by, but it feels necessary to tell the story in this way. Casey Affleck’s excellent portrayal of a young, naive Robert Ford is unforgettable, and Brad Pitt is no slouch either. Oh, and did I mention Nick Cave and Warren Ellis did the music? Seriously, it’s win, win here folks.

7)There Will Be Blood : Yes, this and Assassination were the two best films I saw in ’07. Sorry to disappoint No Country fans. Paul Thomas (P.T.) Anderson’s masterpiece There Will Be Blood was mind-blowing for so many reasons. The fact that this director also made Punch-Drunk Love and Magnolia is a testament to his rare talent of going one-up on his previous efforts. Both films were already very good, so when I went to see TWBB in cinemas, I wasn’t expecting it to be his best. Man was I wrong. Hot damn. The film stars Daniel Day-Freaking-Awesome-Lewis as oil-man Daniel Plainview, seeking incredible wealth in the town of Little Boston during the early 19th century. The towns pastor Eli Sunday sees through Plainview’s schemes and attempts to prevent his violent plans from going ahead. To say Daniel Day Lewis eats this performance for breakfast is understating it greatly. The man means business, and his ruthlessness eventually shows through the complexities of his character. The film itself is equally as brilliant though, with nice touches of cinematography from Roger Deakins, and a great performance from Paul Dano, who is sure to be a star. It’s obvious P.T. draws influence from Stanley Kubrick, with lingering shots and a memorable soundtrack, the result is outstanding. It was one of the best films I saw at the cinema this decade, and definitely not one to miss.

6) Mulholland Drive: I dedicate this one to the shroomers. David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive is good, like, really good. Like The Assassination of Jesse James, you’ll need to prepare for this one, albeit in a different way. You will not understand this film on one viewing, in fact, you could watch this film everyday for the rest of your life and still have no idea what the hell it’s all about. So I’ll try and make this as concise and simple as possible. Mulholland Drive stars Naomi Watts as Betty Elms, an aspiring actress who moves to California to audition for a movie. While in her aunts apartment she meets and befriends a women suffering from amnesia. Betty now must finds this woman’s identity, whilst still being available to audition for the movie. Now, you shouldn’t really take that synopsis as the set-up for the entire film, because after about 20 minutes, Mulholland Drive takes you to another planet. I kid you not, things get weird, characters change names, vague clues arise, and hobo’s kill people by looking at them. No shit. If that doesn’t warrant a viewing, then I don’t know what does. Director David Lynch is probably my favorite living artist. The man makes films for his own personal satisfaction and I respect that. His understanding of mise-en-scene is select to only a few directors. There is something about Mulholland Drive, it’s a searing satire on our Hollywood system and yet everything is not quite what it seems, but when it comes to an end, it feels tangible in some respect. I urge you all to see it.

5) Inglourious Basterds: Okay, I know what you’re thinking. Any righteous purist would not have picked a film that was released so damn recently. Well I say screw the purists, this film was a goldmine. Inglourious Basterds takes us to Nazi-occupied France during World War II. Aldo Raine, played by Brad Pitt, leads a group of Jewish-Americans through Germany to scalp and brutally mutilate Nazis, which in turn, scares numerous associates of the Third Reich. Meanwhile a Jewish refugee Shoshanna Dreyfuss escapes from the clutches of the “Jew-Hunter” (I’m not even kidding) Colonel Hans Landa exceptionally portrayed by Austrian actor Chrisophe Waltz. Saying anymore about the films plot will only dampen this truly electrifying film. I can’t talk about the film without first discussing Quentin Tarantino. Whilst I can’t say I love all of his work, Tarantino has managed to blur the line between mainstream cinema and cult to appeal to a wider range of audiences, all without sacrificing his vision. This is particularly evident with Pulp Fiction. I won’t sugar-coat anything here, I was somewhat reluctant heading into Inglourious Basterds. I wasn’t sure if Tarantino would bring us down the path of Death Proof, another exploitation flick showing us all his influences and little of his own flair. Oh how I was so very wrong. Inglourious encapsulates everything that is great about Tarantino. His enthusiasm, his dialogue, the music, the simmering tension. It’s just pure unadulterated cinema. Dare I say it’s probably his greatest achievement as a director. The only weakness I can draw from the film was Brad Pitt’s performance. Now, I’m not digging on Brad Pitt, I mean please, this is his second film on my list, but he really phoned this one in. That said, it hardly detracts from what it essentially an enormous triumph.

4) Lost in Translation: It’s no secret that Japan rules. I’ve never been there, but it’s without a doubt one of my dream destinations, and one film I owe that to is Lost in Translation. The film has a simple set-up. Actor Bob Harris, played by Bill Murray, is in Tokyo doing promotions and interviews for various networks. It’s obvious things aren’t sitting well with him, a sense of emptiness and isolation almost takes its toll before he meets neglected newlywed Charlotte played by Scarlett Johansson, and the two form an unlikely bond. Lost in Translation utilizes Tokyo’s culture and night-life to amazing effect. The film moves at a dreamy pace and features an array of wonderful and unforgettable moments. Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson are uniformly excellent, and their relationship feels authentic. It’s difficult to find a film nowadays that really stays true to human nature, we get a lot of flash with no bang. Here however, we see the aching, the longing and the flaws that exist, the ones that are purely in our nature. This is a film that needs to be experienced for it’s simple beauty. Every time I revisit it, it brings a new experience. See. This. Film.

3) Oldboy: I’ve been waiting to talk about this for some time. I really need to profess my love for this work of utter twisted genius. Regardless of whether you love it or hate it, surely you can’t say that it’s unoriginal. One night a man gets taken to a police station. Drunken and disorderly he pleads his case and is let into the cold, rainy night to get home in time for his daughter’s birthday. In his drunken daze however, he is taken by an unknown captor and locked in a hotel room. For 15 years. He isn’t told why or who did it, so upon his release he seeks his revenge in a most grotesque and violent manner, and it doesn’t skimp on the violence. Oldboy is not a revenge flick in the traditional sense. Yes, it has a protagonist who is all kinds of badass, but he is also driven by powerful motives. Oh, and the ending has a twist you will never forget. The emotional impact is completely jarring and outrageous and boy does it raise many-a question. If you’re the kind of film-goer that wishes to test the limits of what’s really possible in this wonderful medium, then don’t miss it. This is definitely not for the faint of heart, or squeamish. I crave films that push my psychological boundaries, and Oldboy fits that mold perfectly.

2) Spirited Away: This list wouldn’t be complete without an animated film, and Hayao Miyazaki’s cake-topper is Spirited Away. The story is about a young girl named Chihiro who after moving to a new town, discovers an amazing world of strange and wild characters. That synopsis does the film a great injustice though, because the film is so rich with ideas that you can’t help but be completely blown away by the details on screen. Miyazaki is better known for making Howl’s Moving Castle and Princess Mononoke, both of which are visionary genius. For my money though, it’s Spirited Away that trumps them completely. I’ve lost count of the amount of times I’ve seen this film. You lose yourself in this world of bizarre characters and scenes and before too long the whole damn thing is over. The film recalls all the best parts of those Disney classics and expands on them. There aren’t too many films I consider magical, but this is just that.

1) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Well, what can I say about this. Every once in a while you see a film that takes you completely by surprise. A film that assaults the senses and fires up those brain cells. A film that you want to tell you friends about so badly that you froth at the mouth and in turn, they look at you creepily for gushing so obscenely. Eternal Sunshine is one of those films. It’s impossible to categorize this work. It’s romance, it’s sci-fi, it’s drama, it’s comedy, it’s Jim Carrey, it’s Kate Winslet, and it’s just totally awesome. The film is a about a strange couple that undergo a procedure to erase their memories. They decide to do this after their relationship falls apart, but it’s only through the process of loss that they discover what wonderful times they had together to begin with. Let me tell you first that this film is soul shattering. It grabs you by the scruff of the neck and pulls you down the rabbit hole. If the plot sounds confusing at first, don’t be alarmed. Yes, it’s difficult to understand the first time around, but Eternal Sunshine begs for repeat viewings. Even if you can’t understand the story, the relationship more than compensates with an emotional arc that has an impact every time. It’s written by Charlie Kaufman, well known for works like Being John Malkovich and Adaptation. The guy has obviously never heard of the word derivative and his pairing with director Michel Gondry, known for The Science of Sleep and Be Kind Rewind and his inventive music videos, is a stroke of genius. I’m not sure what else to say, this film epitomizes everything that’s great about modern cinema, but still remains a timeless masterpiece in it’s incredible innovation and originality. If there is one movie this decade you have to see before you die, it’s this one.

Well, there you have it. Hope you enjoyed reading it. You’d better have. Just joking, but seriously, comments and feedback would be much appreciated! What’s your own top 10?

Michael Kiossev

Late to the Inceptional party? Inception Review

Every so often a film is released with an obscene amount of hype. Such is the case with almost every Christopher Nolan film. Ever so slowly becoming a household name, Nolan has consistently delivered interesting and original material the likes of which Hollywood hasn’t seen for decades. With nary a bad film to date, has the young auteur finally bit off more than he can chew with Inception?

Dom Cobb (Leonardo Di Caprio) is by his own admission the world’s most skilled extractor. Capable of entering dreams, Cobb has the ability to steal well kept secrets and ideas from the mind of his assigned targets. Few are able to do the job as well as him, and for that, he is payed handsomely. Lately however, he has been haunted by the memories of his dead wife Mal (Marion Cotillard), who is sabotaging Cobb’s dreams far more frequently than usual. He is then hired by businessman Saito (Ken Watanabe) who wants Cobb to enter the mind of Robert Fischer Jr. (Cillian Murphy), a heir to a rival business empire, not to steal an idea, but plant one. For this job he assembles his best and brightest including his assistant Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), an impersonation specialist in Eames (played by Tom Hardy), scientist Yusuf (Dileep Rao), and talented young architect Ariadne (Ellen Page).

I don’t blame you if you think the synopsis is a lot to take in. The film is in overdrive from the beginning and if you aren’t going along for the ride within the first half-hour, prepare for a tough and tedious slog. For those relish the complexity though, you might find that Inception is the ultimate elixir. It will take repeat viewings to truly grasp everything that is at play here. The first half of the film is all about the setup. We learn the rules, we learn the people, we learn the disastrous consequences if they fail. It’s easily the weakest part of the film and contains some seriously lengthy exposition. It’s by no means bad, but even 10 minutes off the running time would have done it a world of good.



The second half of the film however, is the cinema experience at its most potent. With any other director, the ‘dream inside of a dream’ sequence could have been a horrible mishmash of scenes that made no sense whatsoever. With Nolan at the helm we get a feeling of full control. Tight editing, music, acting and tension make for a breathless final act that doesn’t let up until the final shot, and it’s a corker.

I’m not going to sugar-coat it, the movie’s initial impact is mind-blowing, but the thing that warrants multiple viewings is the emotional weight it carries. There is so much at stake for Cobb, and the ending gives the audience an array of emotions and feelings. I begun this article talking about the ridiculous amount of hype that Inception held. With that impending pressure the film could have buckled under its own weight, instead, it justifies every word of it. See it, discuss it, recommend it.

4/5

Review by Michael Kiossev

Welcome back to the show

Good morning readers.

First things first, yes, I have been absent from your computer screens for quite some time, but it with great jubilation that I announce not only my triumphant (I can hear the trumpets) return, but also the addition of a new member to the family. Without further ado, I present to you, Michael Kiossev.

Hello fellow Movie Hub readers! I’m afraid this is not Chris speaking, but a bright young stud on his way to becoming film criticism royalty. Of course, that’s a total lie, but I am a consumer of movies the likes of which few have seen. Did someone say introduction? No? Oh well, I’m giving one anyway.
The name I generally go by is Michael Kiossev. I’ve been good friends with Chris since high school and I’m now in my third year of studying Journalism at Curtin University. I would say the earliest age I remember getting into movies was 10 or 11. I didn’t know much at the time about movies or the making of movies, but I always pretended to. I just wanted to know more than the regular chump. The first movie I can recall being enamoured with was Enemy at the Gates. By no means a masterpiece, but to an 11 year old, it was pure cinematic bliss. It had violence, it had tension, it had nudity and it had a sniper duel. The damn thing ticked all the right boxes. It was like the best videogame I could never play. A state of immersion I had never experienced or thought possible in watching a movie.
From that it was a cascade of information that I needed to have. I needed to inform everyone I knew that this was the best movie I’d ever seen, and that they should seek it out immediately. I needed to watch the special features over and over to get a sense of how they made certain scenes. I needed to get onto the internet, namely IMDB.COM, and check out the trivia page for all the useless little tidbits that the film had (Did you know that it was the most expensive British film made up to that point? Yeah! I don’t care that much either!).
I don’t actually consider Enemy at the Gates to be one of my favourite movies anymore. Hell, I haven’t watch it in years and don’t really plan on revisiting it. It was however, a powerful indication of what I wanted to do, and what I really wanted to see. I was intoxicated by Cinema of all kinds, of all countries. I had to surround myself in as many movies as humanly possible. It’s disappointing to see in this day and age that few movie-goers are willing to experiment, or see something that really challenges them. With Chris giving me the chance to write for The Movie Hub, I hope to get those people that are curious about movies well and truly obsessed.

Cheers and Happy Reading!
Michael Kiossev

Michael will now be a regular blogger on this site.

Staring contest: Twilight: Eclipse review

I’m not ashamed to say I have read the Twilight books. Hell, I kinda liked them. They aren’t exactly great literature, but they are entertaining and easy to read, and the characters are far, far more likeable than the wooden cut outs we are offered in the latest film installment to the series.

For those that haven’t read the series, this was the one to watch. It has action, intensity, all the issues between Edward/Bella/Jacob finally come to a head. Unfortunately, director David Slade opted to go with 2 hours of teenagers staring moodily at one another while Bella bites her bottom lip.

The story this time centers around Bella and Edward staring at one another, whilst Jacob continues to wear no shirt and pine after Bella. Flame haired vampire Victoria is back for revenge, this time with new sidekick Riley and his vampire army at her command.

So what was wrong with the film? To be honest, I couldn’t find much that was right with it. The characters are so unlikeable, I found myself genuinely more interested in the villains, which is saying something. We wait nearly the entire movie to see the final showdown between the Cullen clan/werewolves and Victories army, and I can tell you now, it is not worth the wait. It reminds me of childhood experience of making a sparkler bomb. You watch the little fuse wind it’s way to the powder, and when it gets there… Nothing happens. You sit and wait, and keep watching anxiously for the fireworks, and they never come.

The wolves to me are a great disappointment. There just seems to be no weight behind them, they don’t seem to be great warriors like they are described in the book, but rather, more like giant Labradors.

I think I am agreeing with many people when I say I do not dislike Kristen Stewart or Robert Pattinson. I think they are both very capable actors, but both of them are let down in this film but a totally lifeless script. I don’t have the same high praise for Taylor Lautner, who once again does nothing in this film but wander around shirtless attempting to make tween girls sigh (judging by the box office scores, he is doing his job well at least).

One of the only highlights for me is the inclusion of Australian actor Xavier Samuel. Samuel plays new vampire Riley, and whilst he isn’t given to much room to grow, he at least relishes his role. He is evil, yet we can still sense the innocence of someone who has been drawn into this supernatural world unwillingly. He exudes a certain charisma that a certain other Australian star seems to be severely lacking (Sam Worthington, I’m looking at you). I sincerely hope that I get to see more of Samuels in the future, hopefully in something a little more interesting.

There is still one last chance for the series to redeem itself with the final installment, Breaking Dawn. Breaking Dawn lacks the conflict and action of Eclipse, but without wanting to spoil it for anyone, let’s just say that there are some interesting scenes that could make for a rather absurd film.

All in all I found Twilight: Eclipse to be bloated, boring, stiff and lifeless. I contemplated leaving well before the supposed climax, and did actually leave before the film finished (due to an unforeseen emergency). For some reason fans of the books seem to love the movie series also, which baffles me entirely, as the film betrays every good scene the book created, and leaves so much much wanting in terms of the characters.

Maybe they’re all just content to sigh at Jacobs abs?

1/5